![]() |
The WVFC Flyer for October, 2008
|
|||
THE COMMUNITY OF FLYING by Josh Smith, General Manager Time for our annual MEMBER SATISFACTION SURVEY. We are using Survey Monkey to help collect the data. To take the survey, please goto: 2008 WVFC Membership Survey. The information that you supply is very helpful to not only tell us where we are at, but it also helps us figure out what plans we need to make for the future. As is always the case the club is here to serve the membership and my goal will be to figure out the best way to do that. Open Board Meeting on October 16, Palo Alto classroom 7:00PM in the Palo Alto classroom. Topics for discussion include: resolution readings, financial reports, ops reports, marketing and other activities to help during current economic times, charging for no-shows and late cancellations, open topics. This board meeting is open to all members so come on in and join us. I would encourage bargain hunters to view the blue dot on the aircraft information pages. The blue dots disclose various special rates on the aircraft. In many cases aircraft owners have established block rates and other discounts which can help lower the cost of flying. A reminder that WVFC will be at AOPA. . If you would like to add your enthusiasm to the booth, please E mail Christine@wvfc.org to volunteer. We will provide free passes to anyone who is willing to represent the Club at our booth. AOPA is also looking for volunteers to help park planes. For more information go to the aopa website.
Please remember to take the Members Satisfaction survey. This information is very helful to us as we business plan and come up with new ways to improve the Club. Thanks and stay safe out there! Josh SQUAWKS AND STUFF by Lucy Geever, WVFC Chief Pilot chiefpilot@wvfc.org Before we proceed let me define a few terms per WVFC policy 1.) An Airplane Discrepancy 2.) Squawk report We are now beta testing a new Squawk form in some WVFC airplanes with the goal of helping pilots write more comprehensive discrepancies. 3.) Aircraft Condition report Airplane discrepancies are an important part of our aviation world. We need to be aware of discrepancies when we come across them and then we need to handoff the discrepancy to the expert mechanics who can address the discrepancies. It is vital that this handoff from pilot to mechanic include precise, detailed information of what the pilot observed. We pilots should not try to diagnosis a problem, that is the mechanic’s job. We should explain in detail what we have witnessed and report what we were doing when we saw a certain thing occur. Give atmospheric conditions, give specific RPM settings and drops, give any and all details you think might be relevant. As much as practical, we pilots need to be sure we do our homework before we pass off a discrepancy to the maintenance department. All discrepancies addressed outside of the regularly scheduled maintenance event window are very expensive, especially when the airplane must be ferried for service, Everyone’s belts are tightening and it is important we vet issues as completely as possible when we have an airplane in our possession. Our mission at WVFC is to have safe and affordable airplanes. For many people the affordable is becoming less and less of a reality. Our goal must be to have a maintenance event only when there is truly a problem. I am the first to admit that 100% attainment of this goal is impossible, but I know we can do a pretty darn good job when we try. If everyone is willing to take ownership of their part in the discrepancy process, and only hand the front desk an educated, well written discrepancy report, we will have safe airplanes at the most affordable prices. This will help to keep our Club strong. If you see something that might be a problem but you are not sure, that is okay - we are an educational organization. I’m not asking you to do anything outside of your comfort zone or abilities. Do confess that you don’t know if you are seeing a problem, but do state your concerns. In this case ask for help - ask a CFI or staff member. We will help walk you through a discrepancy. If there is no one to ask, be on the safe side and just Squawk/ground the airplane if you think it is appropriate. Document the discrepancy and leave a message for the front desk via voicemail 650.856.2030 and tell them what you did and they will alert the maintenance department. So what do I mean by doing our homework before passing off a discrepancy to maintenance. It could mean being sure we understand our equipment, for example: What issues are we seeing currently? We are getting many transponder discrepancies. Some reports have been confirmed, some have not. Since we are getting many transponder Squawks I’d like to give some information and make some suggestions. Here are two sample photos of transponder antennas. On WVFC airplanes you will see one of these types of antennas, inverted, on the airplane belly. They are UHF antennas, very short. If you see two UHF antennas on the belly, one will be a transponder antenna, the other a DME antenna.
Preflight your antenna: If during your flight you think you may have a transponder problem here are some things to think about and some things to help you vet the problem. Make sure the transponder is set to the “ALT” mode. Did you ever wonder why some transponder mode selector knobs have many positions? The C172S airplane transponders selector knob has 5 positions, OFF/SBY/TST/ON/ALT. A transponder needs to warm up before it can be effective; it can take between three and six minutes for it to warm up when placed in the ALT mode. If you have a situation where ATC says to you, “Your transponder appears inop,” you need to make sure it is set to the ALT mode. If it is OFF, you ought confess to ATC that it was OFF. Turn it to ALT and tell ATC it may take a few minutes before they get a signal. Ask them to report when they pick up your signal. Some people will recycle a transponder. But what does this mean? It means different things to different people. To some it means turning the box to OFF and then back to ALT. When you do this the warm up cycle will begin again and it isn’t useful. You may have to wait 3 minutes for the box to cycle fully on. Some people think recycling means resetting the 4 digit code in the transponder box. If ATC suggests you recycle your transponder you may ask them to clarify what it is they want. If your transponder is set to “ALT” do a bit of trouble shooting. I suggest you fly at or above 1,200' AGL and then ask ATC for a transponder readout. If ATC still reports a problem ask for more info: If time permits request a frequency change to a different controlling agency to verify the report. For example, if KPAO tower reports a problem, verify it with NORCAL. If both agencies report the same problem, this will help maintenance when they trouble shoot the Squawk. However, if one agency says you have a problem but a second agency says you do not have a problem, you might not have a problem. The problem might be with the equipment of the first controlling agency. If you Squawk a transponder in this instance you might be sending maintenance on an expensive wild-goose-chase. If a problem was reported during your flight where are some things you can do and think about after landing. Check the antenna. If the antenna is grimy please wipe it off. On the Aircraft Condition sheet report what ATC said, state what you did and what was observed. If the antenna was dirty, state that it was dirty and tell us if you wiped it down after your flight. Ask the next pilot to confirm the discrepancy. To guarantee you are aware of all written discrepancies you need to check the Maintenances Status Board before every flight. If you confirm a problem with two controlling agencies when you were at or above 1,200’ AGL and the antenna is clean when you land, Squawk and ground the airplane. If you do not confirm with two controlling agencies and you were not at or above 1,200’ AGL, you may not have gotten accurate information. If this is the case, please don’t ground the airplane. In this case write an Aircraft Condition report that might look like this: “KPAO reported MODE C appears inop, flew only in pattern at KPAO, 800’AGL and lower. Did not confirm with any other controlling agency. Next pilot please confirm discrepancy.” If you do a “confirmation flight” and no problem is observed please note that on the Aircraft Condition report. You might write something along the lines of, “Per KPAO tower and NORCAL approach, transponder function was normal.” We are operating in a very complex environment with some very sophisticated equipment. We need to do our best to understand our equipment. We need to rely on each other and help each other as we walk through vexing and sometimes unclear issues. We appreciate it when you own the discrepancies you bring to our attention, when you help us vet the issues. Let WVFC CFIs and staff help shepherd you through this process when you need help. WVFC Flight Instructors Improving Your Flying Experience! There are some things cooking behind the scenes at WVFC. Pre-Solo Phase Check: Low Altitude Mountain Checkout: Crosswind Trainer: Happy and Safe Flying! Lucy AS THE WRENCH TURNS by your friendly maintenance department, maintenance@wvfc.org We have had some requests for a maintenance seminar. Well your wish is our command. This coming Thursday, October 9th at 7PM, we are going to have a general discussion maintenance seminar, with bbq at 6PM included. This will be held at the Palo Alto maintenance facility with topics including; carb heat, the engine and its oil, temps and open discussions. I look forward to seeing you there and having a good time going over the systems and related maintenance of WVFC aircraft. Going green and saving green. We have recently seen an increase in the excessive use of aircraft lighting systems. This seemingly minute area of aircraft operation can have a very meaningful effect on the rental price of the aircraft as well as the amount of waste the plane generates. What we are seeing is full use of every aircraft light during the day, while the aircraft is on the ground or in the air. Not only is this wasteful, it really does not make much sense. Let's look at the rules and recommendations, light by light. - First the position or nav lights. These particular lights are only required to be on during aircraft operation, from sunrise to sunset. Its alarming to see an aircraft during the day, in its tie-down, with all the position lights on. This is neither required nor recommended by the FAR AIM. It is, simply put, wasteful. - Second the anti collision lights. If so equipped, aircraft with either red and or white anti collision lights should be used during any aircraft operation. Note, they should not be used where they can cause harm or be detrimental to other pilots. It also helps to alert pedestrians and pilots that the aircraft is, or will be operated. - Third are the landing lights system. The only time they are absolutely required is for night flight on aircraft for hire. I would suggest that for any aircraft, it is a much safer proposition during night operations to have a working landing and or taxi light. I do not feel it is even safe to move a plane under its own power at night unless the landing light system works. In FAR AIM, section 4-3-23 paragraph c, it encourages pilots to use their landing lights on the take-off roll and in and around airports to increase the ability to be seen by other pilots. This of course should be based on " Aircrafts manufacturers recommendations of operation of landing light and electrical systems should be conserved". Based on the above recommendations we can call see there is no recommendation to have the nav lights on during the day at all. Hopefully we can eliminate this use. We can also see that the landing light is not required for ground operation during the day at all. It seems silly I suppose, however the excessive use of electrical systems on the ground does a couple of things. 1. It keeps the electrical system in a constant state of discharge. Alternators rarely charge above 1000 RMP, let alone keep up with a full electrical load. This causes the battery to wear out quicker (both an expense and disposal issue) and if you were to compensate by increasing the RPM's, now fuel burn, brake usage and other areas are expensed. 2. It takes away from the total life of the bulb. Average landing light replacement is $200 for a 60 hour bulb. Essentially the base cost of an aircraft maintenance goes up $400 per every 100 hours, or raises the price of the plane $4/hr. Plus we have to throw the bulb away, adding to waste issues. Again, my biggest hope would be to at least eliminate the usage of landing light on the ground during the day and the use of nav/position lights at all during the day. I would say the higher percentage of pilots have all operating lights on while they are just idling in the tie-down. Hopefully I have demonstrated that this is as unnecessary as it is costly and wasteful of resources. Your Friendly MX Department :)
THE SIMPLE LIFE by Dave Fry, Aviation Safety Counselor And I’m not talking about the “reality” (or what passes for it on television) show. I’m talking about flying a really simple machine. Life can get pretty complex when there are over 100 circuit breakers, two Flight Management Systems, two jet engines, and a few hundred thousand worth of avionics in a plane moving over 80% of the speed of sound at one end of the speed range and about 120 Knots at the other. As much fun as I have flying the Citation VII, it’s easy to lose the stick-and-rudder feel of a really simple aircraft. After 20 years away from them, I flew a sailplane last Saturday. In one sense, they are really simple. No hydraulics, no engine (no vapor lock, no fuel usage computations, no mag check, no prop or feather checks), a single radio with no navigation equipment except the sectional chart and the pilot’s internal GPS, no generator/alternator, and in the few sailplanes that have flaps or retractable gear, you raise and lower them by hand. As you may guess, Sections 3 and 7 in the manual are almost non-existent – if you don’t have a system, you can’t write about it, and it can’t go wrong. On the other hand, there are some potential gotchas for the powered pilot; just try to do a go-around. I’ve actually done one, but it’s not something you can count on being able to do. I was both stupid and lucky, and “stupid” is something you can count on; “luck” isn’t. But that was a LONG time ago, and I like to pretend I’m smarter now. So all landings are forced landings, and you get one shot to get it right. In addition, the basics of soaring are aerodynamics and weather. The top glider pilots really know these topics, because they are your lifeblood when you’re soaring. And when you go back to basics, things are simple, but you may need to know a lot more about them. Here are just a couple of examples that also apply to powered planes, but we rarely think of them in the powered plane context. In a steep turn in a glider, you’re going (maybe) 60 knots in a 60 or 70 degree bank turn – pretty standard whey you’re thermalling and trying to hold the powerful core of the lift. The difference in speed between the inside wing and the outside wing is substantial. As a result, two things happen – (1) the outside wing has a lot more drag, causing the sailplane to yaw to the outside of the turn, (2) the outside wing has more lift, causing a serious over-banking tendency. The pilot, then, carries inside rudder (to counteract the yaw), and outside aileron (to counter the over-banking). Yes, it’s cross-controlled, but no, it’s not uncoordinated. The yaw string (even more sensitive than a ball) is straight up the canopy. If you do it right, anyway. The glider pilot spends even more time on weather reports and forecasts than the powered pilot, but looks for different things. The powered pilot is looking primarily for clouds, potential IFR, icing, turbulence, and then if the trip is a “go”, looks for the effect winds will have on ground speed, fuel burn, crosswind component, … The glider pilot, on the other hand, wants to know if the air will be unstable enough to have thermals (if things warm up enough). Then when the thermals are most likely to begin popping and how high the thermals will go. Or if there is a good shot at getting wave action over the Sierras. As I said earlier, these concepts apply to the powered planes we have in the club, but we rarely think of them. However, next time you’re headed to Truckee, Reno, or anywhere east of the Sierras, put on the glider-pilot hat, and think about wave (you should also get up to speed on some of this as part of your Mountain Checkout), and figure out where the wave and rotor will be, where lift will be smooth and useful, and where it will be violently rough. Which side of the mountains will have thermals, and which will have the down drafts. And take a look at steep turns the next time you fly them and look at where the controls are to keep things coordinated. But keep in mind that the torque/P-factor stuff also has an effect on control positions. It’s good to get back to basics. |
||||
|
© 1998, 2008 West Valley Flying Club. All rights reserved. |
||||