BACK

  May, 2008
ACHIEVEMENTS

Solo
Isabel Guis
JBrian Bustamante
Joyce Clifford
Sam Osborn

Private Checkride
Joe Campbell
Eric Jennings
Kent Burke
Andy Talbot

Instrument Checkride
Kent Wright
Adam Coates
Alex Roetten
Mayank Thanawala
Will Washington

Commercial Checkride
Jeff Katz

CFII
Paolo Resmini

ATP - AMEL - ASES
Rob French

--> The Proud CFIs:
Rob French (x2)
Darryl Kalthof
John Otte
Gordon Reade
Arkady Erlichman
Dave Fry
Chuck Helleweg
Dave Zitten
Nariman Farsaie
Steve Gauvin
Ali Ashayer (x2)

NEW MEMBERS

Douglas Olsen
Dan Salah
Natalia Lavrishina
Mark Starritt
Erik Onorato
Kevin Gruener
Marit Berre
Stan Campbell
Charles Heger
Thomas Quinn
Cameron Ring
Andre Castano
Don Frain
Tom Green
Christopher Batey
Gonzalo Hurtado
Glenn Swiatek
Brittany Sabol
Scotty Hayes
Michael Lam
Jude Aranha
David Heine
Andrew Stanton
Kevin Martin
Jim Henderson
Matthew Howie
Jay Nathan
Benjamin Williams
Brad Madeira
Kai Sufka
Larry Ponemon
Jim Barnes
Joshua Miller
Sam Osborn
Andrea Chrisman
David Eimeri
Paulius Pupeikis
Kristin Perkins
Joseph Talamo
Jerry LaJoie
Martin Tibbitts
Carlos Perez
Fabrice Barbier
Celine Barbier
Tom Henry
Guy Bar-Nahum
Peter Curtis
Joseph Diaz
Adam Cooper
Melinda Soto
Stefan Braken-Guelke
Robert Ficcaglia
Vadim Antonov
Jens Tutzauer
Todd Burger
Joe Ramos
Roman Yanovsky
Stacy Walker
Marc Valer Serra
Kimberly Nelson
Jon Alexander
Arnaldo Dallera
Andrew White
John Earl
Alex Estrada
John Bodylski
Jason Alexandridis

FLEET UPDATES

N67849 was moved off the flight line at HWD, we are looking to replace this C152

N14008, G1000 172 SP at HWD, has moved to SQL.

N2321M, a nicely equipped warrior with a fresh engine is back online at KPAO.
Looking for a good write-off, want to own a plane and have it produce revenue? N784SP, a 172SP at E16, is a great deal. 172SP’s are great first time investments into the aircraft world. This plane is a sound investment and is flying good hours

N4871V, a 172RG, $75K at PAO has been a real money maker and is a great investment plane for someone who wants something that they can grow into

4894L, 172N at PAO, with a 430, is a great N model with an IFR platform

596JR, at $29K is a steal. This little ECA has been a workhorse ever since it has been on the flight line

4714S, a T182RG when speed and distance are your goals this is plane you want, N5854S is looking for a partner in his T- C182RG

Other aircraft are available just give the GM a call to find out more !!!!

SUGGESTION BOX

Do you have a suggestion or a bit of feedback for the club? Send it to whatsup@wvfc.org.

THE FLYER

The Flyer is the monthly newsletter of the West Valley Flying Club. For more information about the club, please call our Palo Alto office at (650) 856-2030, our San Carlos office at (650) 595-5912, our Hayward office at (510) 781-0101, or our South County office at (408) 683-4102. For information about the newsletter, or to submit an article, contact the Editor at whatsup@wvfc.org.


THE COMMUNITY OF FLYING
by Josh Smith, General Manager

As the weather continues to be beautiful and people begin to make their spring and summer flying plans, I would like to encourage all members, and especially those who have not flown much over the winter and early spring to take some time to refresh their aviation knowledge and get current before they “take-off” on their flying adventures. The bulk of our fleet still allows for a 90 day currency which is consistent with that of the FAA. This means most pilots can stay current within the system by flying 4 times a year. Unfortunately, this also means that we are also not thinking much about aviation the rest of the year, hence our skills, knowledge and general aviation mindset start to deteriorate with the lapse in time. So how do we keep our head in the game and our skills current?

First, I would recommend spending some time trolling the calendar and make a commitment to go to more than one safety seminar or skills clinic each year. The club offers these to our members free of charge and they include many beneficial subject areas. Whether or not you participate in the wings programs, the fact is that it’s a great “free” way to keep your mind and thought processes in and around aviation.

Second, create a proficiency schedule for yourself and stick to it. Post getting my pilot’s license I created a flight schedule which consisted of training and maneuver flights as well a regular schedule of pleasure flights which consisted of flights outside of the Bay Area to keep my flight and performance planning as well as FSS and flight following skills up to date. From time to time the flights got cancelled due to WX, me, or some other outside influence however, starting with that base schedule and sticking to it kept my skills current and my experience evolving.

Third, don’t wait for a BFR or a lack of currency to get you to throw a CFI in the right seat and work on skills. The good news is that flying skills deteriorate slowly and come back quickly. Find a new CFI or your trusted long-term mate and work on a particular skill or skill set. Focus on spot landings, go-arounds, making go/no-go decisions, take off performance, cross country flight planning, or some other new or less used skill set. I know that most of us dread having our flight skills assessed, but I feel this falls in the category of an ounce of prevention being better than a pound of cure.

We all get into flying because it is fun and exciting it takes us to a place where we connect with our dreams and our freedoms. It’s also a sport/hobby that needs to be taken seriously and treated with care and respect. Remember the old saying… safety is no accident.

I would like to draw special attention to the chief pilot’s article this month. We are going to move forward with some changes in our outbound information chain in aircraft incident and accident investigations. The hope will be to create a more positive and proactive learning environment for our members. Nine times out of ten it is we as pilots who are directly responsible for bending and/or completely breaking an aircraft. This may seem astonishing however, outside influences such as birds, WX, mechanical or other non-pilot related factors account for less than 10% of the club’s incidents. The cure is to recognize this fact and as pilots make flight safety a #1 priority. Make diligence and prudent conservative decision making a way of life, and not the exception. Every accident pilot interviewed starts out with some sort of commentary like, “if I had just…,” or “what was I thinking..,” or “I thought I could.” Don’t be one of these pilots.

The board elections are coming up in June. For details on the process and an overview of the schedule please see the elections central website at www.wvfc.org/mem/v/election.html. I would encourage those who have a serious interest in spending time helping create strategic direction for the club, to run. Becoming a board member is a great way to participate and it is a good experience. If you have one particular agenda item, then I would suggest forwarding that item to the existing board rather than going through the entire elections process. For anyone who is interested, I would be more than willing to make time to go over current strategic plans, an overview of the history, and review significant board history to give potential new members some insight to the inner workings.

Finally, I would take just a moment to remember two who were both significant contributors and friends to WVFC, Greg Labrec and Ned Snyder. Greg passed away last month due to complications with leukemia. For those of you who only saw the name of webmaster@wvfc.org, Greg was the man behind the alias, and the father of the wvfc.org website. His efforts put WVFC on the internet roadmap and created a forum, a user community like no others at the time. Whether you were a fan of the site’s uniqueness or not, it remains a huge factor in the club’s growth and access to a broader user community. Greg’s efforts often went unrecognized outside of a few, and were repaid only by a monthly credit of his member dues. I cannot possibly express in words how much it meant to this club and to me. He did it merely for the love of the club and his love for aviation. He was amazing to work with, quick to the point, easy to find a working solution, and never once made me feel that the club’s requirements were an imposition or a bu

My first interactions with Ned were always on the phone. At the time Ned worked the front desk, Cassi was a dial up service and I had nothing to dial up with. In spite of my many requests and constantly nervous changing of the schedule, Ned was always calm, fun and cheerful. When I showed up for my private checkride freaking out and realized I had no foggles Ned gave me his trademark laugh and lent me his. Later, when he became a CFI, we did a few aircraft checkouts and my BFR. Ned just made the flying fun. I cannot stop thinking about his laugh and his complete willingness to smile and enjoy the moment. His loss is to his family, friends and the flying community comes with great sadness.

Thanks for your time, stay safe.

Josh


Ned

On April 18, Ned Snyder suffered a fatal accident in the hills near Cherry Lake, California. Ned had earned his wings in 1989, and then joined West Valley Flying Club in 1990. He worked as the front desk supervisor in PAO, until attaining a CFI rating. He taught the next few years before finally leaving to pursue an airline career. His big heart, integrity and infectious smile made him a deeply loved and admired member of the West Valley community. Ned left his hard-earned seniority at Skywest last November to pursue his real dream job... owner and operator of Norcal Aviation, Seaplane Ventures, Inc. The pay wasn't very good but Ned was like a kid at Christmas--he had never been happier. He leaves behind his amazing wife Vicki, and their son Shaan. Also left grieving are his father Jerry, mother Bobbie, and two older sisters, Wendy and Nancy. His legacy will live on, through countless stories, from the hundreds of lives he touched.

Norcal Aviation shirts, bottles, stickers, and DVD's are available at the front desk at PAO. All proceeds will go to benefit the Shaan Snyder Scholarship Fund, and to keep the doors at Norcal Aviation open for the time being. Ned will be eternally missed, and all that can be done to support his widow, Vicki, and 2 year old son, Shaan, is greatly appreciated. If people are interested in contributing, checks can be made out to "Fidelity 529" and in the memo section, put, "FBO Shaan Snyder," and yes, it is spelled with two a's (Shaan). They can then be mailed to his Wife, Vicki Snyder, at 5605 Laguna Oaks Drive, Elk Grove, CA 95758 More information can be found on Ned's Blog; http://nedsnyderlives.blogspot.com/2008/04/scholarship-fund-for-shaan-snyder.html


Flight Safety -- WHAT IS AND ISN’T HAPPENING IN YOUR HEAD? HUMAN FACTORS IN AIRPLANE ACCIDENTS
by Lucy Geever, WVFC Chief Pilot chiefpilot@wvfc.org

Flying an airplane isn’t rocket science or brain surgery. Most humans with average intelligence can do it. The core foundation skills - fine and gross motor skills, problem solving, the understanding and use of language, effective human interaction and communication - were developed at a very tender age. When a student pilot presents himself to a flight instructor, the CFI can easily assess these skill sets. Early on, the CFI gains a limited sense of the “raw material” he has to work with.

Other early childhood development skills such as self-control and self-awareness are less obvious and can prove to be inconsistent. Heap onto that the task of understanding how a student perceives his environment, how he makes judgments and decisions, and understanding how the student learns, and you can see that the CFI really has his work cut out for him. This dissection of the student’s mental workings, actions and inactions needs to be done by the CFI in concert with the student during training. Once the training is complete, the student needs to keep up the analysis.

Being a safe, and thus hopefully successful, pilot is almost 100% about head work, all about what is happening in that lovely noodle of yours. To be sure, we can be unpredictable creatures, but habit and routine can be helpful in some situations, such as flying. Predictability in the flight environment is considered a good thing.

We have all heard of the accident chain. Now think about it, what does that really mean? Would you notice if you were linking together the chain of an accident? How would you know? What are obvious factors and what are some more subtle ones? I suggest you jot down quick list of your own. Here are some ideas:

  • An experienced pilot on an unknown route, over high terrain at night.
  • Distractions. For example, passengers. They have needs, both physiological and psychological.
  • Flying a new type of airplane.
  • A pilot who is not physically or emotionally up to par but lies to herself, “I feel good enough to go.”¯ Be aware, no one can lie to you better than yourself.
  • A pilot who doesn’t consider the IMSAFE checklist.
  • Unfamiliar terrain features.
  • Unfamiliar airport. Is the pilot prepared for the unfamiliar visual cues?
  • A pilot skips doing the performance and landing calculations or getting a weather briefing.
  • Complacency. A pilot tells himself, “I’ve done this many times before.”¯
  • A pilot has the, “Hey watch me! Watch this cool thing I think I can do with this airplane” attitude. In other words the hot-dogging or show-off syndrome.
  • “I bet I can make this airplane _________ (you fill in the blank).”¯ Some examples might be “take-off just a little bit over loaded,”¯ or “roll… it isn’t certified for aerobatics, but it sure is well built.”

Just one or two of these items may not cause an accident, but keep adding one more poor choice or judgment or lack of awareness to another on a given day and it could get dicey and shove you over the brink.

How does one break the accident chain? The FAA’s DECIDE model is a great place to start. The decision making process needs to start before you even get to the airport. The process needs to be continuous until the airplane is tied-down and secured after the flight. The DECIDE MODEL review:

Detect the fact that a change has occurred.

  • Estimate the need to counter or react to the change.
  • Choose a desirable outcome for the success of the flight.
  • Identify actions which could successfully control the change.
  • Do the necessary action to adapt to the change.
  • Evaluate the effect of the action.

The changes in “Detect”¯ can be subtle or not. If you detect that you are skipping the weather briefing, that is the time to stop and go through the model. Be aware: if you start skipping the weather briefing, chances are you will start skipping other things. Perhaps you “Detect”¯ that you have missed an important item on the checklist. You need to stop and ask yourself why you missed that item and ask yourself what else might you have missed?

When you head out for a flight, what is your decision-making process along the way? When was the last time you unnerved yourself? Did you assess what happened or did you just shrug it off? Did you accept responsibility for your decisions, actions or inactions? When was the last time you considered the FAA’s list of hazardous attitudes as they relate to you? Do they relate to you, or does that list only apply to other people?

Here is a review of those hazardous attitudes:

  1. Anti-Authority: "Don't tell me." This attitude is found in people who do not like anyone telling them what to do. In a sense, they are saying "No one can tell me what to do." They may be resentful of having someone tell them what to do, or may some regard rules, regulations, and procedures as silly or unnecessary. However, it is always your prerogative to question authority if you feel it is in error. The antidote: Follow the rules. They are usually right.
  2. Impulsivity: "Do it quickly." This is the attitude of people who frequently feel the need to do something, anything, immediately. They just act instead of thinking about their options and selecting the best alternative. They do not stop to think, they do the first thing that comes to mind. The antidote: Not so fast. Think first.
  3. Invulnerability: "It won't happen to me." Many people feel that accidents happen to others, but never to them. They know accidents can happen, and they know that anyone can be affected. They never really feel or believe that they will be personally involved. Pilots who think this way are more likely to take chances and increase risk. The antidote: It could happen to me.
  4. Macho: "I can do it." Pilots who are always trying to prove that they are better than anyone else are thinking, "I can do it - I'll show them." Pilots with this type of attitude will try to prove themselves by taking risks in order to impress. The antidote: Taking chances is foolish.
  5. Resignation: "What's the use?" Pilots who think, "What's the use?" do not see themselves as being able to make a great deal of difference in what happens to them. When things go well, these pilots are apt to think that it is good luck. When things go badly, these pilots may feel that someone is out to get them, or attribute it to bad luck. These pilots will leave the action to others, for better or worse. Sometimes, such pilots will even go along with unreasonable requests just to be a "nice guy." The antidote - I'm not helpless. I can make a difference.

I promise you when we do our own self-assessment we don’t want to own the fact that we all harbor these hazardous attitudes. Our inclination is to tell ourselves that it is others who harbor hazardous attitudes, and “not I.”¯ But we are all human and we all have the potential to err. John King, aviation educator and co-founder of King Schools said, “Everyone is stupid for 15 minutes a day, just hope it isn’t when you’re in an airplane.”

Many of our members at WVFC are successful in their business lives. These pilots are “can do”¯ people. These are people who set a goal and meet that goal. In aviation, there will be times when the safest course of action is to not meet the goal. For example, turning around on a cross-county and heading back home when weather conditions deteriorate or prove worse than the forecast. Abandoning a goal can be a hard thing for the “can do” personality type.

SMART PEOPLE DOING NOT SMART THINGS

Here is a short and sad example of a dramatic accident that happened on 16 July 1999. This is a classic example of a smart person, who in one day managed to link together enough to result in an accident in which he and his two passengers perished. There are many ways to lay out this accident, here is but a brief sketch of some probable links in the accident chain:

  1. Witnesses reported that they saw the pilot using crutches and loading luggage into the accident airplane. The pilot had sustained a very serious foot injury the month before the accident and was still healing. (A physical impediment?)
  2. The pilot had relatively low time in his new high performance airplane. All previous flights had been with a CFI on board. There would be no CFI on the accident flight. (Was the pilot ready to handle a new high performance airplane on his own? Did he really understand his equipment?)
  3. The pilot planned a short trip to an island off the U.S. north atlantic coast. The relatively low time pilot had about 310 hours of which 55 were at night. The pilot was about half way through his instrument training. He had flown his proposed route many times. (Did familiarity breed complacency?)
  4. The plan was to leave early enough to guarantee a daytime flight, but the flight launched later than originally planned and day had turned to night. This non-instrument pilot launched over open water into a dark, moonless night sky. Later, reports would come in from other pilots who had flown that night, they reported having had no visible horizon. (Should the pilot have postponed until the next day? Was it ignorance, denial, or some other thought process that led that pilot to think he could safely fly over open water at night in VMC, Visual Meteorological Conditions?)
  5. No record existed of the pilot, or a pilot using the airplane's registration number, receiving a weather briefing. (Did he or did he not get some sort of weather briefing? We’ll never know. If he did not, how could he have possibly complied with FAR 91.103 “Preflight Action?”¯

“Each pilot in command shall, before beginning a flight, become familiar with all available information concerning that flight. This information must include, * For a flight under IFR or a flight not in the vicinity of an airport, weather reports and forecasts, fuel requirements, alternatives available if the planned flight cannot be completed, etc.”
If he did not get the weather, what hazardous attitude was he displaying?

  • Anti-authority? - The rules don’t apply to me.¯
  • Invulnerability? - "It won't happen to me."

Did the pilot know visibilities were relatively low, 4 to 6 miles in haze? Did he anticipate a closing temperature dew-point spread?

No record exists of the pilot, or a pilot using the airplane's registration number, filing a flight plan with any FSS.

The following is a quote from an NTSB general accident research report for the year of 2003. Based on the info I have read, I’ll take a leap here and suggest that these numbers were probably not much different for the years 1998 or 1997. Could the pilot in this accident have known of these statistics?

“There were 1,758 pilots involved in general aviation accidents in 2003, and for 1,434 (82%) of those pilots, there was no record of filing a flight plan. In most cases, a flight plan is required only for flight under instrument flight rules (IFR). However, pilots operating under visual flight rules (VFR) on point-to-point flights have the option of filing a flight plan, which aids search and rescue efforts for pilots who fail to arrive at their intended destinations.

In 2003, only 17% of the accidents that occurred in visual conditions resulted in a fatality, but 66% of accidents in instrument conditions were fatal. Although instrument conditions were present for only 6% of all accidents, 19% of fatal general aviation accidents in 2003 occurred in IMC. One reason for the disproportionate number of fatal accidents in IMC is that such accidents are more likely to involve pilot disorientation, loss of control, and collision with terrain.(1)” (1) http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2007/ARG0701.pdf Annual Review of Aircraft Accident Data: U.S. General Aviation, Calendar Year 2003

At the end of this fatal flight the pilot lost control of his airplane and it plunged toward the ocean at a descent rate in excess of 4,000 feet/minute. (Did the lack of visible horizon lead to spatial disorientation?)

It is very likely, but we can only guess. I don’t know if you have ever experienced spatial disorientation. If you have, you know that it takes a very high level of skill and concentration to ignore the overpowering physical sensation your body is registering and trust your flight instruments with your life. This task is challenging enough for a skilled pilot an unskilled pilot may be overwhelmed and courts disaster.

My guess is that if one digs deeper into this accident one may find more probable links in the accident chain.

In next month’s article I will lay out two situations we have had at the Club recently, one an accident and the other an incident. Luckily, no one was injured.

The Club has added a thread to the WVFC Bulletin Board Listed under GENERAL DISCUSSION ¯ the topic is SAFETY.¯ The goal of this forum is to provide for an area where the club can review safety concerns. Together we can analyzing the use of club airplanes our safety practices our use and/or abuse of the equipment and a look at what is and isn’t happening in our heads It is our hope that the information provided will create a positive learning environment to help us all be safer pilots and better stewards of our equipment. Personal attacks, propagation of myths and rumors will be deleted. Lively, considerate and respectful conversation is highly encouraged. See you in the forum.

Have fun and remember to DECIDE often!


AS THE WRENCH TURNS
by your friendly maintenance department, maintenance@wvfc.org

Heat warning; Please be careful in with the coming heat spells. Whether you are flying in an air-cooled engine or one of the new fancy liquid cooled engines, please be mindful of the outside temps and be kind to your engines. Try to stage climb instead of a full out accent, minimize slow flight times, and ground runs, and always be mindful of the gauges and what they are telling you.

Additionally, for all operations, cruising, approach aircraft are designed to operate optimally in standard weather conditions. Variation in the outside conditions to anything other than standard wx, the pilot will need to adjust the engine operation, starting procedure, taxiing procedure., etc. for the conditions that exist at that time. This could mean more or less prime, leaning or enriching the mixture, extending or shortening the engine warm-up time. Always try to be aware of what the engine and aircraft are telling you.

Please consult your operating handbook for take-off, landing, and climb performance.

Speaking of the POH please be sure to consult normal operating procedures prior to squawking an aircraft. We are seeing a spike in false squawks, a large number seem to stem from a lack of knowledge in how to operate specific equipment. Please vet as much of the issue as you can prior to squawking the aircraft.

Be Green, please note that there really is no advantage to running an aircraft with all of the lights on, in the middle of the day while on the ground. We continue to see aircraft idling in the tie-down, on the taxi-way with all of the lights on. Think about it in these terms Normal lights run about 40 hours and then there done, they are not recyclable and get thrown away. If we eat up there time when they are not needed we are just adding to our local waste. From a cost perspective light replacements run about $100 - $250 pre light, labor and parts. These costs add to the cost of the aircraft.

Enjoy the flying weather; just remember how it can affect aircraft performance.


A NOTE FROM OPERATIONS
by Christine Kelly

Hello Members,

First and foremost, members, please note that West Valley maintenance tracks oil consumption for all club planes and that it is not necessary to observe in the key book the addition of oil. Please understand that it will help to lessen the workload if you do not note the addition of oil on the aircraft observation page your help with this issue is greatly appreciated.

In more entertaining news: The time for civilian space travel has come the rollout of VirginMotherShip "Eve" has been announced. This milestone event will be held July 28 and only confirmed passengers will be invited to attend this historic event. West Valley will be trying to setup a seminar with details on this monumental event - keep an eye out for more to come. Anyone who has been waiting for an instrument ground school, your time has come we plan to begin a new series in the beginning of June with John Otte, who will deliver a innovative new system for teaching the Instrument Pilot syllabus and more than just what is required for your test. The class will be held in Palo Alto on Tuesday nights. We will have a definite start date for you in the weeks to come.

Weather permitting, Hawaiian Fridays in San Carlos will be going on every other Friday. This month if the winds aren’t too bad we plan to BBQ the 9th and 23rd so stop by for a burger and a lei after your flight. We’ll light the barbecue around 4:00. As summer comes around we will be having more BBQs at the different locations if anyone would like to volunteer to help out with these, please send me an email, it would be much appreciated by all of the membership, I’m sure.

Coming up in San Carlos is the Hiller Vertical Challenge on June 21st. With a private member party and quite the view from our office, it is sure to be a great time for all. More details to come, check the calendar for updates.

The final days to sign up for the trip through Colorado are here, June 11th - 15th 5 days of flying, 6 States, with limited space sign up while you still can! Trip includes a full mountain checkout & high performance endorsement in Cessna 182’s with an option to go in a retractable gear with 2 students and 1 CFI to each aircraft. Itinerary includes: Cheyenne, Wyoming Glenwood Springs, Colorado Moab, Utah Santa Fe, New Mexico and Sedona, Arizona to relax then pick up to head back to West Valley. Approximately $3500 for everything except for meals. There will be two seminars on mountain flying safety for anyone who will be attending the trip a seminar open to the public will be given in Petaluma by Sparky Imeson Author of the “Mountain Flying Bible,” Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 9:00 a.m. till 4:00 p.m. for $30 per person. A second option given by Scott Stauter will be held in Palo Alto on May 19th at 6:00 pm more details on both seminars available on the West Valley calendar.

The Hayward Air Rally is right around the corner it is not too late to participate. Visit www.hwdairrally.org and join up on the 15th of May for your chance to win some great prizes.

For anyone who has not yet expressed their interest in joining the fine group of pilots heading out to Catalina this June, the 26th - 29th, sign up now with an email to Christine@wvfc.org. Make sure to choose an aircraft and co-pilots. If you have any questions, Logan would love to answer them freeflyguy66@yahoo.com. If you do plan to join the party for this spectacular trip please get in touch with us as soon as possible to assure that you’ll have somewhere to stay as these hotels fill up very quickly!

A little closer on the horizon, Saturday, May 10th will be a day for spins. Andy Geosits has promised to show West Valley members everything they want to know about spins, with a seminar in the Palo Alto classroom from 10am-12pm and demonstrations available thereafter in the 8KCAB, Pitts and Extra. See the calendar for more details. Happening on the same day will be an open house at the Wings of History museum in South County. There will be Pancakes, Tri-tip, Young Eagles flights, Hot air balloons and plenty more where that came from, so stop by if you get a chance.

And on May 17th from 8:00-5:00pm at the PAO WVFC classroom the Santa Clara Valley 99s will be offering their annual Flying Companion Seminar. Details on the subjects covered and information on how to sign up can be found at www.santaclaravalley99s.org/companions . This is for any non-pilot who is interested in being a little more informed. For more details on any of the above, check out the calendar or email your questions anytime, Christine@wvfc.org.


UPCOMING EVENTS

MAY
5/17- 99’s Flight Companion Seminar
5/17- Mountain Flying & Survival Seminar with Sparky Imeson
5/19- Mountain Flying Seminar with Scott Stauter (Colorado Trip)
5/23- Hawaiian Fridays SQL

June
6/11-15 Colorado Trip
6/21- Hiller Vertical Challenge SQL
6/26-29- Catalina Fly-in

Check the Calendar for more Events and Details.


CLEAR SKIES AND TAILWINDS
by Dave Fry, Aviation Safety Counselor

Clear skies and tailwinds. Sometimes we say that as a farewell blessing to pilots who are leaving for a new location or at funerals of our friends who have just died.

And just a brief word about that. As you will have read elsewhere in this newsletter, we have lost Ned Snyder, a long-time member of West Valley and a flight instructor here for several years. We’ve all heard nothing but good things about people who’ve just died, but Ned was the kind of person you only heard good things about while he was alive. He had an infectious smile for everyone, and always had some kind of good news to talk about and he shared gladly in the success of his students and friends.

Back to the topic. We always assume that tailwinds are good things. Certainly, while we’re at altitude and truckin’ along, tailwinds are better than headwinds. We get there sooner, use less fuel, and sometimes are able to eliminate a fuel stop or a pit stop. And there is a certain visceral thrill about seeing ground speeds 50 knots or so faster than normal. I remember a Pilatus trip from Vacaville to Arlington, Texas during which I logged a ground speed of 386 knots (on a true airspeed of about 255). I was hauling empennage just like a jet jockey! Totally ignoring the fact that the jet jocks were probably booking along at about 550 knots ground speed or more.

Despite their benefits at altitude, there are times a tailwind isn’t good, and may actually be very bad. One of those situations is the tailwind takeoff or landing. There are reasons one may want to attempt a tailwind landing - an emergency, for example, or a landing at one of those mountain airfields that is ALWAYS landing one way and taking off the other - either the landing or the takeoff is likely to be with the wind.

So what’s bad about taking off or landing downwind? First, the picture is different, and your judgment factors will be way off. You could make the argument that the higher ground speed during the flare and landing could prepare you for high density altitude operations - which is partly true. However, the approach path for a tailwind landing is nothing like the one for a high density altitude approach (which is the same angle and indicated airspeed as the normal sea level approach, but at a higher true airspeed and therefore higher sink rate). The difference, of course, is that the tailwind descent profile is flatter than the normal one at the same airspeeds and configurations, which could cause the pilot to force the plane down more rapidly than normal to get to the runway.

Clearly, this could be just adding flaps or reducing power early, or even adding a slip to the process, but oddly enough it more often results in pushing the nose down and forgetting all about the “go-around option.” And that results in even higher speeds and LOTS of runway and the occasional prop strike. Worse, your problems aren’t over when you get it onto the ground. Now you have extra energy to dissipate, and the end of the runway is coming up fast. Then at the end of your roll out, you have air flowing the wrong way over your controls - not too bad in a tricycle gear, but potentially pretty messy (can you spell “ground loop”¯?) in a taildragger. In fact, a wheel landing with a tailwind is a near guarantee of a ground loop.

OK, so let’s suppose you don’t like what you see and decide a go-around is in order. If you add full power and raise the nose, you’re potentially going into higher tailwinds and maybe even into winds that shear to higher tailwinds. This can result in nearly instant airspeed loss, and if you’re already slow, you can get into the high drag configuration on the back side of the power curve. And, of course this is happening close to the ground.

If anything qualifies as a bad situation, this certainly does.

So what about the downwind takeoff? By the time you get to normal rotation speeds, you’re romping down the runway at speeds that would earn you a ticket on 280, and you’re steering with your feet. Then you rotate and climb (often too slowly, since your brain is telling you that you’re really fast) and get into the very reverse wind shear situation above.

A story from my friend and MD-11 pilot, Jimmy. During a FedEx line check the wind shifted to give about a ten knot tailwind on the runway Jimmy was holding short of. Figuring that there was sufficient runway (he had done the performance chart check), he considered accepting the tailwind, but then thought better of it, and asked to taxi to the other end of the field (about two miles), which ate up time and a boatload of fuel.

The line check pilot complimented him on his decision, and pointed to a bird beside the runway. “See that bird? It is an animal of very little brain, but even IT is smart enough to takeoff and land into the wind.”



© 1998, 2008 West Valley Flying Club. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission
of an officer of the club is strictly prohibited.